Designing for building safety and high performance

By Allison H. Anderson, FAIA

AFTER HURRICANE KATRINA, BAY ST. LOUIS, MS PRIORITIZED REBUILDING CITY INFRASTRUCTURE OUTSIDE OF FLOOD ZONES. THE CITY PLACED CIVIC CENTER ATOP A PARKING GARAGE WITH PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS TO PROVIDE UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER AND RAINWATER CAPTURE.

How you can create a more livable building by understanding your risks and paying attention to details

Building safety is one of the measures of a secure, healthy community and a foundational element to enhance resilience. Building codes were developed to provide minimum standards for public health and safety and have since evolved to address hazards and disasters. However, the limited level of property protection provided by the building code may not address a client’s building performance objectives. After all, the safest, most sustainable, and best performing building is one that doesn’t end up in a landfill.

Understanding potential risks at a project site, selecting appropriate materials, and crafting details that address potential vulnerabilities enhance a building’s resilience and community’s ability to recover from adverse events. Embarking on a new project with safety and performance as top priorities can help buildings and communities thrive.

Know your risk

Understanding risks at a project site is a good place to start, as performance goals should align with the potential hazards that threaten a location. Certain strategies may be useful against more than one type of hazard, but sometimes strategies can conflict with one another. For instance, a continuous load path for hurricane-resistance can also help against lateral movement in earthquake zones, but raising first floor levels against flooding can create a “soft story” prone to collapse in an earthquake.

Architects traditionally analyze site conditions like prevailing winds, presence of water, and orientation to the sun, but now must consider the potential for changes in climate. Community hazard mitigation plans and trustworthy sources for future climate scenarios, such as the US Climate Resilience Toolkit’s Climate Explorer, provide a basis for identifying long-term risks.

Architects can communicate foreseeable hazards to the client, but the client is ultimately responsible for determining building performance goals and defining mission-critical functions. Oftentimes, these goals will mean going beyond the building code. If a building will be occupied during or immediately following a disaster, it may need to meet a higher standard of protection. Additional measures can be taken to reduce a building’s vulnerability if the consequences for interruption are severe economic loss or the failure of an essential service.

Be thoughtful about materials

Materials are critical to occupant comfort and safety, but can also protect the building from damage. Early in the design process, architects can identify appropriate materials that mitigate risks. Examples include:

• Sea level rise and intense rainfall can cause flooding beyond mapped flood zones. A commercial building might include wet-floodproofing materials that can be easily cleaned, restoring the building to use quickly after inundation.
• Changes in rainfall patterns may lead to droughts and place more buildings at risk of wildfires. In this situation, a residence could substitute a shingle roof with concrete composite tile to reduce the chance of embers igniting the roof.
• The number of days with temperatures over 90 degrees is increasing. Outdoor play areas at schools can be designed to reduce the heat island effect and heat gain with permeable paving.

Pay extra attention to details

Careful detailing is necessary for high-performance buildings. A resilient building will have a long service life, excellent environmental separation, low-maintenance cladding, and systems and assemblies that allow for rapid replacement.

Architects are witnesses to the success or failure of building details. Many continue to advance knowledge in the profession regarding adaptation measures to reduce casualties and property damage in hazard events. Research in wind tunnels, fire-safety labs, and debris impact test facilities evaluate promising new technologies, while post-disaster assessments identify the points of failure for structures that could not meet the hazard’s intensity.

Reduce the impact of hazards by paying additional attention to the following building elements:

• Create a continuous load path to help hold the structural frame together when earthquakes or high winds exert lateral forces on a building. Strong joints between the roof, walls, floors, and foundation connect the frame into a system that resists sliding and overturning.
• A standard building envelope is designed to improve thermal comfort and prevent moisture transmission, but may not be prepared for extreme temperatures and intensive rainfall events. Prevent thermal bridging, add window shading, provide generous overhangs, and utilize continuous air barriers to combat extreme temperatures and heavy rains.
• Hurricanes often peel off roof coverings that are inadequately fastened. To avoid this, strengthen roof sheathing and materials, seal the roof deck, and improve flashing.
• When flood waters meet an obstruction, more damage can occur than if the water could pass through. Flood vents and breakaway walls can prevent structural damage and limit recovery to cleaning up rather than rebuilding.
• Wildfires can spread through unprotected eaves and soffits. Flat profile soffits with non-combustible materials, fire-suppressing vents, careful joint sealing, and limited overhangs reduce the chance of sparks entering an attic.

Learn more about designing for resilience and receive continuing education credit on AIAU with our Resilience and Adaptation course series. You can also explore AIA Best Practices for information on how to navigate codes and standards.  

Allison H. Anderson, FAIA, is a principal at unabridged Architecture specializing in resilience and climate adaptation. She is a member of the AIA Resilience Education Working Group.

Image credits

Eugenia Uhl

“Freestanding” Exhibition Shows the Power and Poetry of Sigurd Lewerentz’s Architecture

by AD Editorial Team

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

As part of our 2018 Venice Architecture Biennale coverage, we present Freestanding, an exhibition in the Biennale’s Central Pavilion. Below, the curatorial team describes their contribution in their own words.

Sigurd Lewerentz’s (1885-1975) chapels are marked by an extraordinary imaginative synthesis of northern aesthetic traditions and burial practices in the context of a modernising world. He wrote and spoke little but, in recent years, his work has gripped the imaginations of a generation of architects who look to it for its power, symbolic range, and its poetic, experiential qualities.

Save this picture!

Courtesy of Sigurd Lewerentz Collection, ArkDes

Through archival drawings, new photography, and large-scale interpretative models, Freestanding in FREESPACE unfolds the spatial power of three freestanding canopies from three of Lewerentz’s best known sacred spaces in the form of a three-act play: an inhabitable, sectional scenography and a fabric of experiences that suggest ways in which extra spatial gifts can form the heart of the experience of a place, a ritual, and a landscape.

Save this picture!

© Mikael Olsson

Freestanding presents and re-presents the canopies of the Chapel of the Resurrection at the Woodland Cemetery (1925), Stockholm, the Chapels of St. Knut and St. Gertrude at the Eastern Cemetery, Malmö (1943), and St. Mark’s Church at Björkhagen, Stockholm (1960). Simple in form, they are central to the ritual meaning of the buildings they correspond to, contributing significantly to the visual image of the churches they accompany.

The three extraneous structures were completed across the span of Lewerentz’s career, and each designed in a different architectural style to one another. Despite this stylistic diversity, they all, in different ways, create places for public life between the scales of the landscape and the interior.

Save this picture!

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

Swedish architect Petra Gipp has created three large-scale sectional models which allow for a unique reading of the canopies – how they make a place for people between the breadth of a landscape and the massiveness of a building. Gipp’s models are abstractions, suppressing scale and material in favour of spatial effects.

Save this picture!

© Laurian Ghinitoiu

New photographs taken by Swedish artist Mikael Olsson show the three projects as living, contemporary scenographies. In dissecting and rearranging the structures and their surroundings, the photographs reveal new perspectives on their design. The pictures evoke movement and help to reveal how we perceive distance and intimacy through architectural gestures.

Save this picture!

© Mikael Olsson

A selection of drawings made by the office of Sigurd Lewerentz have never before been shown together. As a sequence, they help to establish the spatial narratives of the canopies, collectively and alone: unique perspectives that show how they mediate their respective landscapes and interiors, alongside plans, elevations and detail drawings that show the diagrammatic composition of these outdoor spaces and their relationship to the main body of the buildings.

Save this picture!

Courtesy of Sigurd Lewerentz Collection, ArkDes

Freestanding, a project by Kieran Long, director of ArkDes, Johan Örn, curator of collections at ArkDes, Petra Gipp, architect, Mikael Olsson, artist, James Taylor-Foster, curator contemporary architecture and design ArkDes, is exhibited as part of FREESPACE in the Central Pavilion of the Giardini della Biennale. 

In 2020, ArkDes will stage the first major exhibition on Sigurd Lewerentz since the 1980s, presenting an in-depth view of the architect’s most well-known buildings while shedding light on projects that have hitherto been overlooked.